EduCause Talking Points

EDUCAUSE, the higher education information technology organization, is active in net neutrality. Why? The first two points of their Talking Points on Net Neutrality answer that:
  1. Net neutrality is fundamentally important to allowing universities fulfill their educational mission. Universities’ goal is to deliver high-quality multimedia instructional material to as many students as possible, including off-campus students and those in rural areas. The widespread availability of open, affordable broadband communications makes distance learning more accessible and effective.
  2. Universities’ Internet research laboratories could be undermined if the Internet is not open to innovation and experimentation. Universities are developing next-generation Internet technologies that will drive the Internet economy. If Internet service providers are allowed to inhibit or degrade these research activities, the United States could lose its leadership role in the creation of Internet-based technologies.
Universities need net neutrality to do their two most basic jobs: teaching and research.

EDUCAUSE’s other talking points are equally good:

  1. The rapid innovation that brought us e-mail, the World Wide Web, interactive online services, and e-commerce depends on an Internet that provides reliable and effective transport for all types of traffic. This critical innovation at the edges of the network will be stifled if network providers are allowed to block or degrade traffic in the middle.
  2. The Internet was designed to be open and available to everyone, which is why it has been so powerful and successful. The Internet was not intended to be under the control of any one party; its value is that it can facilitate communications and the free flow of information around the world. “Tollbooths and gatekeepers are the exact opposite of what the Internet is all about,” said Michael J. Copps, a Democratic commissioner at the Federal Communications Commission. “Down that route consumers can count on paying more and getting less — less content, fewer services and reduced innovation.”
  3. Cable and telephone companies have the ability and incentive to skew Internet use toward their own services. They are supposed to be transparent carriers of broadband services, as noted by Vint Cerf in a letter to Congressmen Joe Barton and John Dingell on November 8, 2005: “Telephone companies cannot tell consumers who they can call; network operators should not dictate what people can do online.” Recently, however,
    1. a telephone company blocked its broadband customers from using VoIP telephone service because it could take revenue away from the company’s phone services;
    2. a cable company ordered consumers working from home to stop using their broadband connection to log into their employer’s virtual private network and tried to sell them a higher-priced alternative service;
    3. an Internet provider in Canada blocked access to a Web site run by the labor union involved in a dispute with the ISP; and
    4. the CEO of SBC told Business Week that companies such as Google, Yahoo, and Vonage would not be permitted to connect to SBC broadband customers without additional compensation to SBC.
  4. Cable and telephone companies have a legitimate right to manage their networks to prevent congestion, viruses, or other illegal uses. This right to manage the network, however, should be narrow and should not allow the cable and phone companies to pick and choose among certain users or applications.
  5. Congress should adopt a strong principle that ensures that the Internet is open to all lawful uses and should establish strong penalties to enforce this principle.
I’ve reproduced all seven talking points here because the EDUCAUSE version appears to be only in PDF; great for printing or viewing; not so good for quoting snippets (also would have been nice to have hyperlinks for the quotes and cases cited). Maybe this HTML version will provide some small amount of further dissemination for these excellent talking points.