Peerflow

Open participation through a fast Internet

Menu

Skip to content
  • Home
  • About

Tag Archives: Opportunity

NPRM Diagram 2: scope of rules

Here’s the diagram from the NPRM that the FCC folks mentioned frequently at the NANOG panel (The Regulators Meet the Operators, at NANOG 48, Austin, Texas, 22 Feb 2010) regarding scope of net neutrality rule making:

FCC-09-93A1_Diagram_2

It does seem to clarify some of the points made by the panelists.

This entry was posted in Broadband, Cable, Capacity, Censorship, Communication, Competition, Content, Copyright, Devices, Distributed Participation, DSL, Internet Access, Internet freedom, Net Neutrality, Opportunity, Packet Shaping, Public Policy, Regulation, Stakeholders, Throttling, Wireless Internet and tagged applications, Austin, Broadband, Cable, Capacity, censorship, Communication, Competition, content, Devices, Distributed Participation, DSL, eyeballs, FCC, Filtering, FTTH, Government, innovation, International acces, Internet Access, Internet freedom, Monopoly, NANOG, net neutrality, nondiscrimination, NPRM, Opportunity, Packet Shaping, Principles, Public Policy, Regulation, services, Stakeholders, Texas, transparency, users, wired, wireless, Wireless Internet | Permalink Technorati Tags: access on February 23, 2010 by John S. Quarterman.

Recent Posts

  • NSA PRISM, Writs of Assistance, Rattlesnakes, and the Fourth Amendment
  • Senators Feinstein and Chambliss shuffle their feet about FISA
  • NSA domestic spying: we stopped it in 1977 and we can stop it again
  • Peerflow has moved to this new WordPress site
  • Economists still calling computer networks “virtual” while interconnectivity is exposing economic externalities

Recent Comments

  • John S. Quarterman on About
  • Ziebart on About
  • GFR June 16 phone conference | Get FISA Right on NSA PRISM, Writs of Assistance, Rattlesnakes, and the Fourth Amendment
  • GFR June 12 phone conference minutes | Get FISA Right on NSA domestic spying: we stopped it in 1977 and we can stop it again
  • NSA PRISM, Writs of Assistance, Rattlesnakes, and the Fourth Amendment | Peerflow on Senators Feinstein and Chambliss shuffle their feet about FISA

Archives

  • June 2013
  • April 2013
  • April 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • March 2011
  • December 2010
  • June 2010
  • February 2010
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007

Categories

  • Advertising
  • Antitrust
  • Applications
  • Art
  • Books
  • BPL
  • Broadband
  • Cable
  • Capacity
  • Censorship
  • Communication
  • Competition
  • Consolidation
  • Content
  • Copyright
  • Corruption
  • Current Affairs
  • Devices
  • Distributed Participation
  • DSL
  • Duopoly
  • Economics
  • Education
  • Emotion
  • Espionage
  • Film
  • Filtering
  • Food and Drink
  • FTTH
  • Games
  • Government
  • History
  • Hosting
  • Indians
  • Innovation
  • International acces
  • Internet Access
  • Internet freedom
  • Internet History
  • Internet Speed
  • IP over TV
  • IPTV
  • Law
  • Malware
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • Military
  • Monopoly
  • Municipal Access
  • Music
  • National Security
  • Net Neutrality
  • Opportunity
  • Packet Shaping
  • Piracy
  • Poetry
  • Politics
  • Postal Service
  • Press
  • Principles
  • Privacy
  • Public Policy
  • Public Safety
  • Radio
  • Regulation
  • Religion
  • Research
  • Rural Access
  • Science
  • Search
  • Senior Access
  • Society
  • Spectrum Allocation
  • Sports
  • Stakeholders
  • Stifling
  • Telephone
  • Television
  • Throttling
  • Travel
  • Uncategorized
  • Video
  • Violence
  • VoIP
  • Voting
  • Weblogs
  • Wireless Internet
  • Wiretapping

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Proudly powered by WordPress